🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute little “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a defunct facility, government authorities and advocacy groups.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated debate over their destiny often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the humans who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities disallowed the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the authorities pays for the expense of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Researchers say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and group interactions point to they are remarkably smart mammals – something one caretaker observed personally.

Burgess spent several years as a beluga trainer, a role that involved earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She formed a special affection for a pair of whales with opposing natures.

“One whale selected me. The other required effort,” she said. “They transformed the way I view connection.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a background of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her time at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility ascribes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say indicates the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The facility did not admit visitors to the guests over the recent season, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and move about with fragments in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not reply to a request for comment, but earlier stated: “The whales … obtain far higher quality veterinary services and constant attention than any individual in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in recent months following the demise of Eos, an sick beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park believed particulars of the incident were leaked to the press and she was fired soon after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s threat to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any attempts to euthanize even a one beluga would require “considerable personnel”, vehicles and machinery.

“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs calls for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official denied a request to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the application would have meant a continued life in captivity and a return to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As Canadians, we know that marine mammals are meant for the ocean, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an transfer that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements indicate a more general lack of awareness of the circumstances of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As officials struggle to find a solution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A proposed sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has been highly debated. The planned site, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain optimistic that it could in time represent a sustainable answer for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Others say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable plan in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the location will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|