🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are paid to address white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.